Arua Has Decided, So Let’s Move and Discuss the Human Rights
Saved under EASTERN AFRICA, Human Rights, Opinion, Uganda
Tags: African Centre for Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture Victims, Arua
Please follow & like us :)
Dozens of people have been arrested for protesting Bobi Wine’s arrest [AP]
The Speaker, Rebecca Kadaga, sending a team of parliamentarians to Gulu and Arua is good, but Ugandans deserve better.
How about our legislators joining the African Centre for Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture Victims (ACTV), member organisations of the Coalition Against Torture(CAT), the National Coalition for Human Rights Defenders(NCHRDs) and the Uganda Human Rights Commission(UHRC) in advocating for the effective implementation of the Prevention and Prohibition of Torture Act No.3 of 2012?
How about if the Speaker was our ambassador in lobbying the State to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture 2006(OPCAT)? The latter allows unlimited access to all these places of detention, whether gazetted or not to designated visiting Human Rights bodies under Article 3 of this protocol. In fact Speaker, it shall not necessitate you to inform the public and media about the Human Rights Committee visits to these places of detention in order to be allowed access.
In fact, informing the media and public only gives time for the detention facility your team is going to visit to either be cleaned up (hide evidence) or limit accessibility to your delegation to only desirable sections within these detention facilities. Going unannounced makes much sense. Announcing these visits reduces it to indeed a visit and not a monitoring. Our neighbour in Rwanda has ratified it, can you do a benchmark visit(s) to find out how Uganda can domesticate the same?
Torture and cruel, inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment violates the non-derogable right to freedom from torture and cruel treatment guaranteed under Article 24 of our Constitution and thereafter, making it an absolute freedom in Article 44(a) of the same Constitution as amended. Why then are we not putting the PPTA 2012 to test? Aren’t the regulations in place? They are there.
Isn’t torture and cruel treatment criminal and punishable? It is. In fact, sections 4 and 7 criminalise torture and cruel, inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment respectively. Besides, under the 2017 Regulations to the PPTA, it is a crime and punishable to victimise any person victim or not intending to report, reporting or who has reported torture. It is also criminal and punishable to victimise a witness or victim reporting torture. The same law assures victims and whistle blowers protection.
Uganda has no witness protection law, but a Bill of 2014. What will guarantee the safety and trust of witnesses or whistle blowers if they wished to confide in this delegation you have dispatched to Gulu and Arua to assess the human rights situation there? How shall we encourage people to come out and report torture and cruel treatment or punishment to the relevant authorities yet there is no Witness Protection Act in Uganda to assure them of being zxprotected? The 2017 regulations for the PPTA 2012 break the rigidity on how to report crime by allowing reporting torture using electronic communication like Emails, SMS texts etc, etc. They also allow reporting of torture through anonymous avenues. But how best can we prevent torture in places of detention without ratifying the OPCAT 2006? True, the 1995 Constitution is the Supreme law of the land and makes freedom from torture and cruel treatment or punishment absolute, but where is the will to implement the PPTA 2012?
This issue is pertinent and, therefore necessitates your intervention besides the worrying issue on why it is unbecoming for civilians to be tried by the General Court Martial yet the law has a different position on this. Why arrests before investigations have been done are now the song? All these are Archilles heels that promote a Torture prone environment.
In conclusion, we are still a work in progress as there is still a lot to be desired. As far as effective realisation of the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment guaranteed in Articles 24 and 44(a) of our Constitution and their truthful enjoyment by not only parliamentarians, but Ugandans at large are concerned. Sending a team of MPs to visit scenes after the media has been awash with human rights violations is doing something, but impacting on nothing.
Mr Mukalere is a human rights activist and also the communications and advocacy officer at the African Centre for Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture Victims.
